From: Rebecca and Rowland (rebecca@ASTRID.U-NET.COM)
Date: 12 Oct 98, 03:33 EST
From: Rebecca and Rowland <rebecca@ASTRID.U-NET.COM> Subject: Re: J. Guyer: libeller extraordinary was Re: "Rude" behavior by developers >Wow. I'm a big fat liar. And a meany, to boot, I'm sure. How will I ever >live with myself? I don't care. Just stop libelling me. >I have no qualms being judged by my two-year record on this list. I have no >qualms with Roland being judged by his record, either. Interesting that you can't even get trivial details like my name correct. What has your two year record on this list got to do with anything? Have you made a habit of conducting libellous campaigns of personal abuse on the Alpha-D list? >Let me clarify a misconception in Roland's post (The misconception is my >fault. I did not lie to him, nor even intentionally mislead him Given that you have (in private email) told me that people note bugs `on the bug list', I think this demonstrates that you're lying again. It seems obvious to me that you've got a personal grudge against me. Why air your personal grievances on the Alpha-D mailing list? [snip] >The fact that Roland gets troubleshooting advice and solutions from the >list should be ample evidence that his posts are being read and dealt with >as feasible. Judge us by whether we solve your problems, not by some >contrived standard of etiquette. Since the serious problems that I've reported haven't been dealt with, I suppose you want me to conclude that the Alpha-D mailing list is useless? Using *my* standards, I think the Alpha-D mailing list is a useful discussion forum, despite the fact that none of the serious problems I've raised have been fixed. I didn't expect them to be fixed, therefore I do not consider that the Alpha-D list is useless. btw, my standards of politness aren't contrived, they're just what I've learnt to expect from normal people. Rowland.