Re: "saveas -f filename"

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Aaron Montgomery (agm@purduenc.edu)
Date: 16 Sep 99, 01:38 EST


From: Aaron Montgomery <agm@purduenc.edu>
Subject:      Re: "saveas -f filename"

>(First, there is no "saveas" command anywhere!  I only see a "saveAs"
>command.  Is this what you mean, Aaron?)

yep, sorry for the confusion.


>saveAs
>--> The SFPutFile dialog appears, with the name of the front window
>   put into the filename-editing field.
>
>saveAs blahblah
>--> The SFPutFile dialog appears, with "blahblah" put into the
>   filename-editing field.

In both of these cases, the file is written to the disk, and marked
as clean, correct?

>saveAs -f blahblah
>--> If there is no file named "blahblah" already existing in the
>   current directory, then, nothing happens, except that the
>   StatusWin displays a message saying:  "Can't launch file."

Yep, I just saw the C code that does that.
Is this appropriate or should saveAs create the file?

>--> If there is already some file named "blahblah" in the current
>   directory, then, running the above command simply renames the
>   front window to "blahblah", and makes the window marked "dirty".
>   (Nothing is actually written to disk at this time.)

That's what I thought, is this what people want? Admittedly, I am
really (really, really, really, ...) hesitant to change the meaning
of any of Alpha's commands, but this seems a little incongruous with
the other two cases. At the very least, this ought to make it into
the documentation so someone doesn't use saveas -f in a script and
lose data.

Aaron

<finger:agm@purduenc.edu>
<mailto:agm@purduenc.edu>
<http://faculty.purduenc.edu/agm/>


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by das@users.sourceforge.net with hypermail 2b29 on 31 Mar 01, 11:51 EST