Re: "incorrect" implementation if incremental search

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Fetherston, Tom (tfethers@FORE.COM)
Date: 14 Apr 00, 03:33 EST


From: "Fetherston, Tom" <tfethers@FORE.COM>
Subject:      Re: "incorrect" implementation if incremental search

Jonathan E. Guyer replied to me:

>At 1:07 PM -0400 4/13/00, Fetherston, Tom wrote:

>>This works as you wish and also allows the use of regex'es as search
>>patterns.

>It lets you delete characters, but it doesn't back up.

You mean it doesn't back up the search?  Another little detail.

>>Of course it needs re-written for alpha 8 ;).

>It works just fine in Alpha 8 ;^)

I mean that it doesn't work with the new forms that regex'es take on in
Tcl 8.1+

So much code that I barely understood when I wrote it, **sigh**
--

Tom


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by das@users.sourceforge.net with hypermail 2b29 on 31 Mar 01, 11:51 EST