Re: "incorrect" implementation if incremental search

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Jon Guyer (jguyer@HIS.COM)
Date: 14 Apr 00, 03:37 EST


From: Jon Guyer <jguyer@HIS.COM>
Subject:      Re: "incorrect" implementation if incremental search

At 1:33 PM -0400 4/13/00, Fetherston, Tom wrote:

>You mean it doesn't back up the search?  Another little detail.

Sure, but a little detail that Warren was specifically looking for.
Being able to delete at all is a big plus, though.

>I mean that it doesn't work with the new forms that regex'es take on in
>Tcl 8.1+

Ah, I see. OK.

>So much code that I barely understood when I wrote it, **sigh**

Why do you think I palmed this off when Warren contacted me about this? 8^)
--

   Jonathan E. Guyer
   <http://www.his.com/jguyer/>


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by das@users.sourceforge.net with hypermail 2b29 on 31 Mar 01, 11:51 EST