Recent Changes - Search:

WikiDoc

Categories

User Definable Key Bindings

Main.UserDefinableKeyBindings History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup

January 23, 2006, at 10:50 PM by 212.180.15.164 -
Changed lines 18-19 from:

<jkock, Feb2005>: I think the above phrase

to:

<JK, Feb2005>: I think the above phrase

Changed line 133 from:

jeg I had the same (although not quite as strenuous) reaction

to:

(jeg) I had the same (although not quite as strenuous) reaction

Changed lines 227-228 from:

cbu 03Mar05 User Issues

to:

(cbu) 03Mar05 User Issues

Changed lines 282-283 from:

cbu 03Mar05 Menu Item Procedure Declarations

to:

(cbu) 03Mar05 Menu Item Procedure Declarations

Changed lines 350-351 from:

cbu 03Mar05 API for Menu/Shortcut Creation

to:

(cbu) 03Mar05 API for Menu/Shortcut Creation

Changed lines 452-453 from:

cbu I see four main requirements for this feature:

to:

(cbu) I see four main requirements for this feature:

Changed line 469 from:

cbu We already have [[newPref menubinding ... that is used throughout AlphaTcl to

to:

(cbu) We already have [[newPref menubinding ... that is used throughout AlphaTcl to

Changed line 512 from:

cbu Sure, that seems perfectly reasonable. The main issue in this

to:

(cbu) Sure, that seems perfectly reasonable. The main issue in this

Changed line 541 from:

cbu AlphaTcl already has built in support for this. When a menu binding pref has

to:

(cbu) AlphaTcl already has built in support for this. When a menu binding pref has

Changed line 584 from:

cbu This should probably take place in [[menu::buildOne, after all insertions

to:

(cbu) This should probably take place in [[menu::buildOne, after all insertions

Changed line 593 from:

cbu AlphaTcl already has several UI examples for user defined menu bindings. The

to:

(cbu) AlphaTcl already has several UI examples for user defined menu bindings. The

Changed line 643 from:

cbu True enough about the [[listpick bit. We could easily have a single dialog

to:

(cbu) True enough about the [[listpick bit. We could easily have a single dialog

Changed line 651 from:

cbu Some challenges that I foresee are mainly for back compatibility. For example,

to:

(cbu) Some challenges that I foresee are mainly for back compatibility. For example,

January 23, 2006, at 10:49 PM by 212.180.15.164 -
Added lines 1-676:
Page last modified on January 23, 2006, at 10:50 PM
Hosted on SourceForge.net Logo